
(First published January 18, 2022)
I just finished listening to the final episode of the podcast series, “The Rise and Fall of Mars Hill.” It was a tough haul, hearing of so much woundedness caused by the leadership of Pastor Mark Driscoll. The clip in each week’s intro of his screaming made me cringe. This isn’t a dissertation post to examine all the Mars Hills issues, but rather a quick, not-super-organized reflection on the overall series and what it has to say about church.
First, it reminded me in a powerful way of the vulnerabilities of our pastors. Pastors are just men, after all, subject to faults and failings, battling a sin nature just like everyone on this planet. The enemy’s plans are always to steal, kill, and destroy, and when he can take out a spiritual leader through snaring and flaring his intrinsic vulnerabilities—a leader with so much influence, at that—he hits the jackpot (or so he thinks..for a limited time). We hear about it often, and I can think of one such case in the headlines this past year. The wreckage is great: pastor/family ruined, congregation bruised and bleeding, social media cacophonous with condemnation for Christians, the name of Jesus and the gospel dragged through the mud. Pastors need an accountability network, close friends who will tell them the truth, access to pastoral counseling themselves, and consistent prayer cover.
Second, it made me think how, on a smaller scale, there are many churches functioning in the dysfunctionality of a personality cult pastor. In one of the early episodes, Mike Cosper discusses the converging events of a charismatic pastor with a big, “unique” vision spun for a congregation who believes they are in on a special move of God. The seeming urgency of the mission and their “chosenness” for it causes those in the pews to push aside the red flags of false doctrine, spiritual abuse, and unbiblical practices. They sign on to the leader’s spin, sometimes announced from the pulpit, regarding people who leave either because they’ve seen the toxicity or because they have been fired for confronting it. The congregation will, as Cosper also explores, justify the means to achieve the ends, nodding to each other that there’s expected “collateral damage” (Mark’s “bodies behind the bus”) along the way to great evangelistic “success.” Further, there are people in the seats who are abuse survivors of one trauma or another whose personalities are wired to get hooked into further victimization, without realizing they’re walking down a road already traveled. Lastly, some are just so hungry and thirsty for connection with Jesus that they’ll push aside the problems in order to gain the glimmers of the gospel that do come through. The result is that many churches in this country, small and large, are operating in dysfunctionality that echoes Mars Hill to one degree or another.
Third, I ponder the necessity to a healthy church model of a “plurality of elders” leadership team. Driscoll’s narcissism, arrogance, and growing hardheartedness to the love/grace/mercy of the gospel created a nightmare that no one successfully confronted. Although there were two other founding pastors of Mars Hill, Driscoll was allowed to push them aside and “rule” unchecked. I don’t know a lot about church leadership structure, but it seems like a no-brainer that to allow only the senior pastor to set policy, determine direction, and hire/fire church pastors/staff is a recipe for at best, a lopsided church and at worst, as in the case of Mars Hill, tyranny. (See Acts 15 for how a healthy church handles a difficult policy decision.) A pastor who understands his own fallibility enough to establish a leadership structure with inherent checks and balances (i.e., men/women who are allowed, even encouraged, to oppose his decisions if unbiblical) is both wise and humble. Further, people determining whether or not to make a new church their home would be wise to ask if this kind of structure is in place.
I’m genuinely sad for those wounded by Mark Driscoll and the Mars Hill leadership team (many of whom, either in the midst of the chaos or since, have realized their roles in that system, repented, re-clarified their relationships with Christ, and sought reconciliation where possible). Some of the stories were just heartbreaking, especially when shaming and shunning were involved. For those who have never been able to return to church or to Christ, who now question their faith entirely and want nothing to do with Christians, I want to say—”Wait, don’t let Satan win! This is exactly what he wanted!” I want to tell them that man and an unbiblical church failed them, but that Jesus didn’t, and that His heart is broken that they were battered.
I’m also sad for those in leadership who no longer feel qualified to minister to God’s people, despite their now being on firm footing again with Jesus and others. If anything, they may be more qualified now than before their personal failures; see the biblical example of Peter, who Jesus felt fit to lead the Jerusalem church after his denial hours before He went to Calvary. Peter wasn’t ready till he was wrecked. Some of these folks might actually be ready now to lead compassionately and closer to the gospel than ever, aware of their need for accountability, biblical counseling on an ongoing basis, and a solid team of humble men and women to serve alongside.
Well, that’s my quick take on the Mars Hill podcast series. I felt it instructive and cautionary, a hard listen but a good lesson.
“Then Jesus said, ‘Come to me, all of you who are weary and carry heavy burdens, and I will give you rest. Take my yoke upon you. Let me teach you, because I am humble and gentle at heart, and you will find rest for your souls. For my yoke is easy to bear, and the burden I give you is light.’ Matthew 11:28-30, NLT

